sp_Registration Register sp_LogInOut Log In

Please consider registering

Register | Lost password?
sp_Feed Topic RSS Blank
"Social Sharing" of Marijuana
sp_BlogLink Read the original blog post

Posted by

Michael M. Levin, Esq.


May 5, 2013 - 11:55 pm

Image Enlarger

Moncrieffe v. Holder:

“Sharing a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration, let alone possession with intent to do so, does not fit easily into the everyday understanding of trafficking, which ordinarily means some sort of commercial dealing.” Moncrieffe is a case about immigration, so it is unclear what its impact will be beyond immigration law.

California law has treated “social sharing” the same as sales, because Health and Safety Code section 11360 uses the language “…sells, furnishes, administers, or gives away…” in defining the felony offense. Until now, sharing a joint with a friend would constitute a felony offense. In light of the Moncrieffe decision, there is at least some legal basis to argue that “social sharing” is not the same as trafficking, and therefore should not be treated as such.

HOWEVER, don’t go thinking the issue is settled in California. IT IS NOT! But this case provides a basis for arguing that social sharing is not trafficking.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters